Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« March 2010 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
concert reviews
General Impressions
Music Commentary
Society
New Group
Blogcritics
Well, In My Opinion...
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
MTT, SFO & WCC Wow Philadelphia in Mahler Symphony #2
I'm going to state what I consider to be an obvious, a priori, comment:  Mahler was the greatest contrapuntalist after Bach and before Stravinsky.  And his Symphony #2 in c proves it.  Moreover, Michael Tilson Thomas with his band of San Franciscans went a long way to confirm this axiom.  Joining him were soprano Laura Claycomb and mezzo Katarina Karnéus and the Symphonic Choir of Westminster Choir College on Tuesday, 23 March in Verizon Hall at the Kimmel Centre in Philadelphia.  

 Now granted, any performance of Mahler's "Resurrection" Symphony is going to be a special occasion; notwithstanding that it rivals the First in popularity and is not infrequently performed.  As far I can recall there have been at least three performances of the Mahler Second since the Kimmel Centre opened nine years ago.  Nevertheless, whenever you amass resources of the scale needed to do this piece, it's noteworthy.  The speed, clarity, precision and force of the double basses at the onset immediately gave one the impression that this was not going to be like any other performance of this piece.  Thomas' direction was as clear and precise as any orchestra player could ever want.  There was absolutely no ambiguity as to entrances, dynamics or tempo.  

Referring to my comment about Mahler the contrapuntalist, throughout the first movement there is double, triple and quadruple counterpoint constantly going on, and all themes are highly recognisable, interesting tunes.  Therefore, when everything is being played correctly the listener is kept very busy deciding upon which themes to focus; because, Mahler has all, or most, of them working simultaneously.  The composer tries to distinguish each melody during all of this counterpoint with a score that is chock-a-block with all manner of nuances.  

Mr. Thomas, fully understands the significance of these uncompromising demands upon the listener, and seems to delight in them.  Not only did he precisely observe and render this myriad of particulars; but, his taut, rhythmic drive and tension inducing manipulation of tempi compelled the listener into the full sweep of the movement.  The string playing was as clean as a well honed blade; even the little glissandi which Mahler indicates in the score were perfectly synchronised.

Such accuracy was even more evident in the second movement.  Here we started with the perfect ländler; all grace and elegance, with perfectly timed luftpausen and (again) gentle understated glissandi, making the sudden outbursts all the more effective.  Orchestral pizzicato rarely comes off cleanly. This becomes particularly true with the return to the movement's opening in which all the strings, except the double basses, are divided. Additionally, this section is a study in nuanced subtlety of dynamics in which the various divisions of the strings play different levels of piano, pianissimo and pianississimo.  Usually one can at best expect a reasonable facsimile of how it's supposed to sound.  Not here.  Mr. Thomas and his group produced the tightest, cleanest pizz I can remember from any orchestra.  

I must say, Mahler's tempo marking of "In quietly flowing motion" for the third movement (Scherzo) belies the dark, underlying tension of the music.  There's nothing "quiet" or "tranquil" about this music.  Mahler, perhaps more closely than any other composer I know, comes dangerously close to communicating a specific emotion musically.  And here, again, Mr. Thomas' reading of the score and his orchestra drove this movement to it's blazing climax with it's anticipation of the last movement's opening, to it's exhausted collapse, leading directly into the "Urlicht."

Katarina Karnéus has a lovely, clear, yet rich mezzo-soprano voice. Her dynamic range is not unimpressive.  She and the orchestra were refreshingly balanced with a sensitive reading of this transitional yet, important little movement based on one of Mahler's des Knaben Wunderhorn songs. Thomas manages to get the orchestra to almost completely disappear at the end of this movement.  In fact, one of the most impressive aspects throughout the performance was this orchestra's incredible dynamic range from almost imperceptibly soft (for an orchestra) to blisteringly loud, rivalling the London Symphony Orchestra in its heyday under Davis.

This contrast was no more illustrated than by the sudden outburst of the fifth movement recalling the climax of the Scherzo, indicating (apparently) the "final days."  Nevertheless, following the beautifully played aftermath, and after all things have finally died down, there then came the longest percussion crescendo the likes of which I never heard that proceeded into the "march of the dead," (as it were) that seemed to virtually shake Verizon Hall.  This was easily the most stirring performance I have ever heard of this.  Much of it can be attributed to Mr. Thomas' brilliantly deft use of subtle accelerando moving you  toward the next section only to pick up the pace again to the next.  One got the impression that just when you thought there couldn't be anymore, there was.  After all hell had broken loose (again) there then came the haunting offstage band and their signalling the final end.  The co-ordination between the offstage group and the main group was perfect. During the aftermath of the final "destruction of the earth" climax the offstage group must co-ordinate with the solo flute and piccolo in the main orchestra, this is particularly difficult to get right even with the cameras and all the trappings of modern technology.  I have heard this section played from total disaster to fairly close.  This was the first time I have ever heard this section played as near to perfection as I think it could ever be played.  Just amazing.  

Finally, as if from out of nowhere the choir enters singing a true pianississimo (ppp).  Soprano Laura Claycomb did a nice job of ever so slightly emerging from the choir, standing up only that point where her line began to separate from the choir.  She has a very fine voice and high musicality; her high G float was very nice indeed.  Again, balance was everything.  Both singers were equally matched in power and ability; which was made abundantly clear during their duet.  The choir was the best Westminster Symphonic Choir I've heard in over two decades.  Dr. Miller has evidently been working on rebuilding that full, rich and glorious sound for which the choir and its school had been famous until the early 70's. It was just so refreshing to hear real tenors and basses again.  The altos also had a depth and richness of tone that had been missing for far too long.  The sopranos, as usual, were fine with a glorious high Bb.  It was nice to know that Mr. Thomas isn't afraid of the organ either.  It only comes in at the final statement of the choral, but the affect of hearing it at almost equal level with the orchestra is truly stirring.  

I really don't have enough superlatives about this performance and this orchestra. Its first chair soloists are top notch especially William Bennett oboe, Robert Ward horn, and Mark Inouye trumpet, who gets to hold and decrescendo to pppp on an high C for three long measures.  In fact, when Mahler would occasionally go into his "chorale" writing, the brass could produce the kind of sound that was worthy of any Bruckner symphony, of which that writing was redolent.

So Mikey, when are you and The Bay Band coming back to Philly?  You're the best!  

  

Posted by ralph.fisher at 8:36 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

View Latest Entries